When Google helps, Mary Creagh’s Written Questions

The new and last Shadow Secretary of State for International Development (unless the Labour Party loses the 2015 General Election), posted similar written question to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the Department for International Development. The question(s) was/were:

Foreign and Commonwealth Office
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how much his Department allocated to the Conflict Pool in (a) 2014-15 and (b) each of the five previous financial years.

Ministry of Defence
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department allocated to the Conflict Pool in (a) 2014-15 and (b) each of the five previous financial years.

Department for International Development
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how much her Department allocated to the Conflict Pool in (a) 2014-15 and (b) each of the five previous financial years.

Creagh got her answers from all three departments–FCO, MOD and the DFID It reveals that the Conflict Pool, soon to be the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) (see page 133 of the British Army Journal 2004) IS NOT funded by any or all of the three departments but by HM Treasury.

Yet this question is easily google-ble. Check it out (Conflict Pool Treasury Funding and Conflict, Stability and Security Fund Funding. It’s so easy and the information is provided by the long established Independent Committee for Aid Impact and other organisations. Isn’t this a waste of time asking a question which can be google-ed? And not forgetting that the question has been asked before!! (See this question by Bob Ainsworth a Labour Party Colleague. Do Shadow Ministers just aimlessly ask written questions?!

Note: Once again I am not a member of any UK political party.

Posted in DFID, Mary Creagh | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shuffling your cards: From Harriet to Mary

First came Harriet Harman, who didn;t really shadow much of DFID (in my view).

Then came Ivan Lewis, who knew DFID from his past, but DF..it during debates.

The came Jim Murphy, Scot and not much change to relate (to)

Now comes Mary (Creagh) (sorry, I can’t think of a good poem/rhyme)

How has Miliband really focused on International/Global Development?

Disclaimer: I am not a member of the UK Labour Party or any political party in the United Kingdom or elsewhere.

Posted in DFID, International Development, Mary Creagh | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Will the post-2015 goals be any use?

Originally posted on Phil Vernon's blog:

The post-2015 development goals need show how to reduce fragility and increase resilience in conflict-prone contexts. They also need to be designed as a system of genuine incentives for participation and transformation.


The UN’s Open Working Group is nearing the end of its work and will soon make its recommendations for a set of global goals to replace the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) next year. These will, presumably, guide people and institutions across the world in determining how to continue building increasingly prosperous, well-governed, secure, healthy, just, equal, well-educated and well-adjusted societies over the next fifteen years. As if this were not enough, they will also – presumably – attempt to square the circle between shared economic growth and sustainability, during a time when population and consumption demand continue to rise rapidly. Oh, and they also somehow need to accommodate the very different political perspectives of countries as diverse as…

View original 1,664 more words

Posted in International Development, Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Soft Power

Originally posted on Phil Vernon's blog:

The House of Lords Select Committee on Soft Power and the UK’s influence published its report this week, comeplete with mind map and pages and pages of evidence.


Their report urges the UK government and others with influence to continue to maximise the UK’s international influence through “soft” channels, and recognises the wide ranging ways in which UK institutions are networked for good in the world. The report appears to recognise the end of the Western domination and recommends the UK to be part of the way the worlds governance is changing. It also suggests a formal review to learn the lessons of the Afghanistan adventure, and suggests that “smart power” is the better way forward.

I appeared before the committe for International Alert, and we also submitted written evidence as follows:

Written evidence submitted to the House of Lords Select Committee on Soft Power and the UK’s…

View original 1,402 more words

Posted in Posts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Worker’s Party (Singapore) on…International Development!

Disclaimer: I AM NOT  a member of any Singaporean political party or any political party in any country.

You don’t here this from the government but surprisingly, from the up and coming opposition party in Singapore:

Many developed countries in the United Nations have committed to target an ODA contribution of 0.7% of gross national income (GNI). What is Singapore’s ODA as a percentage of GNI?

While I don’t expect Singapore to target 0.7%, are there plans to increase our ODA contribution in the future?

Does the Government see international development as a cost-effective way of furthering our foreign policy goals?

Given the multifaceted nature of international relations today, what is the role the Government sees international development playing in the years ahead?


Mr. Giam, however may have incorrectly defined Official Development Assistance which is:

i.  provided by official agencies, including state and local governments, or by their executive agencies; and

ii.  each transaction of which:

a)  is administered with the promotion of the economic development and welfare of developing countries as its main objective; and
b)  is concessional in character and conveys a grant element of at least 25 per cent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 per cent).”

See: http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/officialdevelopmentassistancedefinitionandcoverage.htm#Coverage

It is dubious if scholarships to foreign students who study in the “donor state” can be counted as OECD’s definition of ODA. More of it is discussed here and in this link. After all, the OECD doesn’t exactly exclude educational scholarships as ODA, see this definition.

In any case, it is surprising and yet refreshing to know that the Worker’s Party in Singapore mentions international development as a topic.

Once again: I am not, repeat not a member of any political party.

Posted in International Development, OECD, Official Development Assistance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Operation Patwin: DFID and the MOD in humanitarian efforts

Many people in the UK and worldwide has criticised the British government (the Coalition government) for cutting the British military expenditure, personnel and hardware, while “ringfencing” the ODA budget (DFID administrative costs have been cut). Now, with the dreadful news of Typhoon Haiyan’s destruction, most people on twitter, and facebook, to a lesser degree, are cheering on the military’s effort in “Operation Patwin”, Humanitarian Assistance Disaster Relief response. Here are some of the links available on the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force website:

First order to HMS Daring to shift from Exercise Bersama Lima to the Philippines

Mercy Dash

Views of some of the crew

http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/News-and-Events/Latest-News/2013/November/14/131114-Daring-Illustrious”>Lusty ordered to the area as well/a>


Aerial Surveillance


RAF C-17 ordered

C-17 lands

Lusty in Singapore, most definitely at the RN logistics depot, 20 November

(Even the Military Stabilisation and Support Group (MSSG) has been deployed there–one individual as well as the Commander Joint Logistics, Permanent Joint Forces Headquarters is there.

Thus it shows that military cuts do not affect the UK military’s ability to respond to disasters. Second, it shows how foresight and planning is crucial: HMS Daring was deployed to the region several months ago. (This mind you, was a significant move since the Royal Navy has been practically absent from the Pacific since 2003. Also, Daring’s deployment shows that RN policy makers are better off that the illogical SRN website–won’t tell you want that stands for).

Third, it shows want cross-departmental work means. The UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) could not have responded effectively without the Royal Navy and Royal Air Forces’ units. Neither could the RN or RAF correctly address the issue without the advice and possibly leadership of DFID, Foreign and Commonwealth (FCO) officials, Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) members there.  I have of course, held the belief that development officials should be the key leaders/coordinators in a disaster relief zone, not the military. It is yet to be seen who exactly is the overall leader in the Philippines: Which UN agency? Which military force–US, UK ASEAN? Which development agency or NGO? After all,CGD has been calling on aid donors to remember the failures of Haiti and a similar call from ODI experts.

Fourth, back to the military part and just a bit. This shows how neither the Royal Navy or the Royal Air Force can act alone. Both are needed in such HADR operations. Unlike the “disband the RAF” idiots from the SRN website, I see both the strategic airlift flights (C-17 and C-130 see this) and the two RN ships as work as a partnership and not a competition with each other. Only idiots like the SRN website, and to a lesser degree, the Phoenix Think Thank would argue the Senior Service is better off in HADR. All nonsense.


Posted in DFID, Humanitarian Aid, International Development, Overseas Development Institute, Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The World Bank: how is it doing?


Very detailed article on the World Bank Group at present.


Originally posted on Phil Vernon's blog:

Last week I spent some time in Washington D.C., on the fringes of the World Bank/IMF autumn meetings. I was discussing International Alert’s recommendations for making the next round of the Bank’s International Development Association (IDA 17) funding as effective as possible in the fragile and conflict-affected countries which make up an increasing proportion of the IDA caseload. From what cab drivers told me, the autumn meeting came at an opportune time, since the impasse over the US federal budget has limited tourism and official travel considerably, hence is having an impact on their incomes. Given many D.C. cab drivers are originally from places like Pakistan, Ethiopia and Somalia and frequently send money there, this will be having an impact on the livelihoods of their relatives back home.

But the Bank is also supposed to have an impact on poverty and development in more direct ways, and for years there have been voices saying it…

View original 1,529 more words

Posted in IDA, International Development, International Development Association, Posts, World Bank | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment